Dynamics of Planetary Systems
1. The two-body problem
1.2 The shape of the Kepler orbit
the shape of the orbit is given by
where
is known as the true anomalythe closest approach of the two bodies occurs at
or azimuth , the longitude of periapsis is .
1.3 Motion in the Kepler orbit
the mean motion or mean rate of change of azimuth
the mean anomaly
define the eccentric anomaly by
Kepler's equation
1.8 Nearly circular orbits
1.8.2 The epicycle approximation
the azimuthal frequency is
the vertical frequency is
the radial or epicycle frequency is
derivation (Lagrange's equation & perturbation method)
consider an axisymmetric potential
in cylindrical coordinates , and assume that the potential is symmetric about the equatorial plane , so . The equations of motion for a test particle, , can be written:the second equation implies,
the first equation can be rewritten as
examine a circular orbit in the equatorial plane,
, . Equation (1.158) yields- Equation (1.157) can be solved
Now consider a nearly circular orbit with the same
-component of angular momentum as in equation (1.159). Letand expand the potential in a Taylor series around
:The epicycle approximation neglect all terms in the expansion above that are higher than second order in
and . 2. Substituting the Taylor series (1.163) into the third of equations (1.156) to obtainwhere the vertical frequency is
- We next turn to the radial equation of motion (1.158), replacing
by , the potential by its Taylor expansion (1.163), and by its Taylor expansion . The terms independent of cancel because of equation (1.159), and discarding all terms that are higher than first order in or , we obtain where the radial or epicycle frequency is
- Equation (1.157) can be solved
the solution of
and :derivation
- It's easy to solve
from equation (1.167) with integration constants and .
Substituting into relation (1.162), it reads - Solve the azimuthal motion by writing equation (1.157) in the form
dropping terms higher than and using equation (1.169), we find
comfine the integration constants
Comparing the
with the equation (1.46),we find that
, , so we have- It's easy to solve