Nayfeh, A. H. (1993). Introduction to perturbation techniques . Wiley.
pdf with notes
The Floquet theory to solve the Mathieu equation.
The detuning analysis used in forced oscillations.
9 Forced Oscillations
u ¨ + u + 2 ϵ μ u ˙ + ϵ u 3 = F cos ω t (9.4) \ddot{u}+u+2\epsilon\mu\dot{u}+\epsilon u^3=F\cos\omega t \tag{9.4}
u ¨ + u + 2 ϵ μ u ˙ + ϵ u 3 = F cos ω t ( 9.4 )
Resonances
u ( t ; ϵ ) = u 0 ( t ) + ϵ u 1 ( t ) + ⋯ (9.5) u(t;\epsilon)=u_0(t)+\epsilon u_1(t)+\cdots \tag{9.5}
u ( t ; ϵ ) = u 0 ( t ) + ϵ u 1 ( t ) + ⋯ ( 9.5 )
u = a cos ( t + β ) + F 1 − ω 2 cos ω t + ϵ [ ⋯ + ⋯ P ( ω ) + ⋯ ] (9.16) u=a\cos(t+\beta)+\frac{F}{1-\omega^2}\cos\omega t+\epsilon\left[\cdots+\frac{\cdots}{P(\omega)}+\cdots\right] \tag{9.16}
u = a cos ( t + β ) + 1 − ω 2 F cos ω t + ϵ [ ⋯ + P ( ω ) ⋯ + ⋯ ] ( 9.16 )
primary or main resonance: ω ≈ 1 \omega\approx 1 ω ≈ 1
secondary resonance: ω ≈ 0 , 1 3 , 3 \omega\approx 0,\dfrac{1}{3},3 ω ≈ 0 , 3 1 , 3
Detuning Analysis
Secondary Resonances
In this case ω \omega ω is away from 1 1 1 .
If ω \omega ω is away from 0 0 0 ,
D 0 2 u + 2 ϵ D 0 D 1 u + 2 ϵ μ D 0 u + ⋯ + u + ϵ u 3 = F cos ω T 0 (9.19) D_0^2 u+2\epsilon D_0D_1u+2\epsilon\mu D_0u+\cdots+u+\epsilon u^3=F\cos\omega T_0 \tag{9.19}
D 0 2 u + 2 ϵ D 0 D 1 u + 2 ϵ μ D 0 u + ⋯ + u + ϵ u 3 = F cos ω T 0 ( 9.19 )
u = u 0 ( T 0 , T 1 ) + ϵ u 1 ( T 0 , T 1 ) + ⋯ , T 1 = ϵ T 0 u=u_0(T_0,T_1)+\epsilon u_1(T_0,T_1)+\cdots,\quad T_1=\epsilon T_0
u = u 0 ( T 0 , T 1 ) + ϵ u 1 ( T 0 , T 1 ) + ⋯ , T 1 = ϵ T 0
O ( ϵ 0 ) D 0 2 u 0 + u 0 = F cos ω T 0 O ( ϵ 1 ) D 0 2 u 1 + u 1 = − 2 D 0 D 1 u 0 − 2 μ D 0 u 0 − u 0 3 \begin{align}
\mathrm{O}(\epsilon^0)\qquad\qquad & D_0^2u_0+u_0=F\cos\omega T_0 \tag{9.21} \\
\mathrm{O}(\epsilon^1)\qquad\qquad & D_0^2u_1+u_1=-2D_0D_1u_0-2\mu D_0u_0-u_0^3 \tag{9.22}
\end{align}
O ( ϵ 0 ) O ( ϵ 1 ) D 0 2 u 0 + u 0 = F cos ω T 0 D 0 2 u 1 + u 1 = − 2 D 0 D 1 u 0 − 2 μ D 0 u 0 − u 0 3 ( 9.21 ) ( 9.22 )
for O ( ϵ 0 ) \mathrm{O}(\epsilon^0) O ( ϵ 0 )
u 0 = a ( T 1 ) cos [ T 0 + β ( T 1 ) ] + 2 Λ cos ω T 0 = A ( T 1 ) e i T 0 + Λ e i ω T 0 + c . c . \begin{align}
u_0&=a(T_1)\cos[T_0+\beta(T_1)]+2\Lambda\cos\omega T_0 \tag{9.23} \\
&=A(T_1)e^{iT_0}+\Lambda e^{i\omega T_0}+c.c. \tag{9.24}
\end{align}
u 0 = a ( T 1 ) cos [ T 0 + β ( T 1 )] + 2Λ cos ω T 0 = A ( T 1 ) e i T 0 + Λ e iω T 0 + c . c . ( 9.23 ) ( 9.24 )
where
A = 1 2 a e i β , Λ = F 2 ( 1 − ω 2 ) (9.25) A=\frac{1}{2}ae^{i\beta},\quad \Lambda=\frac{F}{2(1-\omega^2)} \tag{9.25}
A = 2 1 a e i β , Λ = 2 ( 1 − ω 2 ) F ( 9.25 )
u 0 → O ( ϵ ) u_0\rightarrow\mathrm{O}(\epsilon) u 0 → O ( ϵ ) :
D 0 2 u 1 + u 1 = − [ 2 i ( A ′ + μ A ) + 3 ( A A ˉ + 2 Λ 2 ) A ] e i T 0 − ( 2 i μ ω + 6 A A ˉ + 3 Λ 2 ) Λ e i ω T 0 − A 3 e 3 i T 0 − Λ 3 e 3 i ω T 0 − 3 A 2 Λ e i ( 2 + ω ) T 0 − 3 A ˉ 2 Λ e i ( ω − 2 ) T 0 − 3 A Λ 2 e i ( 1 + 2 ω ) T 0 − 3 A Λ 2 e i ( 1 − 2 ω ) T 0 + c . c . (9.26) \begin{align}
D_0^2u_1+u_1=&-[2i(A'+\mu A)+3(A\bar{A}+2\Lambda^2)A]e^{iT_0}-(2i\mu\omega+6A\bar{A}+3\Lambda^2)\Lambda e^{i\omega T_0} \\
&-A^3e^{3iT_0}-\Lambda^3 e^{3i\omega T_0}-3A^2\Lambda e^{i(2+\omega)T_0}-3\bar{A}^2\Lambda e^{i(\omega-2)T_0}-3A\Lambda^2 e^{i(1+2\omega)T_0} \\
&-3A\Lambda^2 e^{i(1-2\omega)T_0}+c.c.
\end{align} \tag{9.26}
D 0 2 u 1 + u 1 = − [ 2 i ( A ′ + μ A ) + 3 ( A A ˉ + 2 Λ 2 ) A ] e i T 0 − ( 2 i μ ω + 6 A A ˉ + 3 Λ 2 ) Λ e iω T 0 − A 3 e 3 i T 0 − Λ 3 e 3 iω T 0 − 3 A 2 Λ e i ( 2 + ω ) T 0 − 3 A ˉ 2 Λ e i ( ω − 2 ) T 0 − 3 A Λ 2 e i ( 1 + 2 ω ) T 0 − 3 A Λ 2 e i ( 1 − 2 ω ) T 0 + c . c . ( 9.26 )
The Case ω ≈ 3 \omega\approx 3 ω ≈ 3
Introduce a detuning parameter σ = O ( 1 ) \sigma=\mathrm{O}(1) σ = O ( 1 ) defined by
ω = 3 + ϵ σ \omega=3+\epsilon\sigma
ω = 3 + ϵ σ
The secular terms in Eq.(9.26) are e i T 0 e^{iT_0} e i T 0 and e i ( ω − 2 ) T 0 = e i T 0 e i σ T 1 e^{i(\omega-2)T_0}=e^{iT_0}e^{i\sigma T_1} e i ( ω − 2 ) T 0 = e i T 0 e iσ T 1 (which generate secular term T 0 e i T 0 / 2 i T_0e^{iT_0}/2i T 0 e i T 0 /2 i )
The solvability condition gives
2 i A ′ + 2 i μ A + 3 A 2 A ˉ + 6 A Λ 2 + 3 A ˉ 2 Λ e i σ T 1 = 0 (9.30) 2iA'+2i\mu A+3A^2\bar{A}+6A\Lambda^2+3\bar{A}^2\Lambda e^{i\sigma T_1}=0 \tag{9.30}
2 i A ′ + 2 i μ A + 3 A 2 A ˉ + 6 A Λ 2 + 3 A ˉ 2 Λ e iσ T 1 = 0 ( 9.30 )
using Eq.(9.25), separate into read and imaginary parts
a ′ = − μ a − 3 4 a 2 Λ sin ( σ T 1 − 3 β ) a β ′ = 3 a Λ 2 + 3 8 a 3 + 3 4 a 2 Λ cos ( σ T 1 − 3 β ) \begin{align}
a'&=-\mu a-\dfrac{3}{4}a^2\Lambda \sin(\sigma T_1-3\beta) \tag{9.34} \\
a\beta'&=3a\Lambda^2+\dfrac{3}{8}a^3+\dfrac{3}{4}a^2\Lambda\cos(\sigma T_1-3\beta) \tag{9.35}
\end{align}
a ′ a β ′ = − μ a − 4 3 a 2 Λ sin ( σ T 1 − 3 β ) = 3 a Λ 2 + 8 3 a 3 + 4 3 a 2 Λ cos ( σ T 1 − 3 β ) ( 9.34 ) ( 9.35 )
this is a nonautonomous system with T 1 T_1 T 1 appears explicitly, transforming this into an autonomous system by introducing the new dependent variable γ \gamma γ defined by
γ = σ T 1 − 3 β (9.37) \gamma=\sigma T_1-3\beta \tag{9.37}
γ = σ T 1 − 3 β ( 9.37 )
so we have the solution
u = a cos ( 1 3 ω t − 1 3 γ ) + 2 Λ cos ω t + O ( ϵ ) (9.41) u=a\cos\left(\frac{1}{3}\omega t-\frac{1}{3}\gamma\right)+2\Lambda\cos\omega t+\mathrm{O}(\epsilon) \tag{9.41}
u = a cos ( 3 1 ω t − 3 1 γ ) + 2Λ cos ω t + O ( ϵ ) ( 9.41 )
a ′ = − μ a − 3 4 a 2 Λ sin γ a γ ′ = σ a − 9 a Λ 2 − 9 8 a 3 − 9 4 a 2 Λ cos γ \begin{align}
a'&=-\mu a-\frac{3}{4}a^2\Lambda\sin\gamma \tag{9.39} \\
a\gamma'&=\sigma a-9a\Lambda^2-\frac{9}{8}a^3-\frac{9}{4}a^2\Lambda\cos\gamma \tag{9.40}
\end{align}
a ′ a γ ′ = − μ a − 4 3 a 2 Λ sin γ = σ a − 9 a Λ 2 − 8 9 a 3 − 4 9 a 2 Λ cos γ ( 9.39 ) ( 9.40 )
The Case ω ≈ 1 3 \omega\approx\dfrac{1}{3} ω ≈ 3 1
3 ω = 1 + ϵ σ (9.47) 3\omega=1+\epsilon\sigma \tag{9.47}
3 ω = 1 + ϵ σ ( 9.47 )
D 0 2 u 1 + u 1 = − [ 2 i A ′ + 2 i μ A + 6 Λ 2 A + 3 A 2 A ˉ ] e i T 0 − Λ 3 e i σ T 1 e i T 0 + c . c . + NST (9.49) D_0^2u_1+u_1=-[2iA'+2i\mu A+6\Lambda^2 A+3A^2\bar{A}]e^{iT_0}-\Lambda^3 e^{i\sigma T_1}e^{iT_0}+c.c.+\text{NST} \tag{9.49}
D 0 2 u 1 + u 1 = − [ 2 i A ′ + 2 i μ A + 6 Λ 2 A + 3 A 2 A ˉ ] e i T 0 − Λ 3 e iσ T 1 e i T 0 + c . c . + NST ( 9.49 )
Similar process as above, finally gives solution
u = a cos ( 2 ω t − γ ) + 2 Λ cos ω t + O ( ϵ ) (9.60) u=a\cos(2\omega t-\gamma)+2\Lambda\cos\omega t+\mathrm{O}(\epsilon) \tag{9.60}
u = a cos ( 2 ω t − γ ) + 2Λ cos ω t + O ( ϵ ) ( 9.60 )
a ′ = − μ a − Λ 3 sin γ a γ ′ = σ a − 3 Λ 2 a − 3 8 a 3 − Λ 3 cos γ \begin{align}
a'&=-\mu a-\Lambda^3\sin\gamma \tag{9.57} \\
a\gamma'&=\sigma a-3\Lambda^2 a-\frac{3}{8}a^3-\Lambda^3\cos\gamma \tag{9.58}
\end{align}
a ′ a γ ′ = − μ a − Λ 3 sin γ = σ a − 3 Λ 2 a − 8 3 a 3 − Λ 3 cos γ ( 9.57 ) ( 9.58 )
The Case ω ≈ 0 \omega\approx 0 ω ≈ 0
ω = ϵ σ \omega=\epsilon\sigma
ω = ϵ σ
D 0 2 u + 2 ϵ D 0 D 1 u + 2 ϵ μ D 0 u + ⋯ + u + ϵ u 3 = F cos σ T 1 (9.64) D_0^2 u+2\epsilon D_0D_1u+2\epsilon\mu D_0u+\cdots+u+\epsilon u^3=F\cos\sigma T_1 \tag{9.64}
D 0 2 u + 2 ϵ D 0 D 1 u + 2 ϵ μ D 0 u + ⋯ + u + ϵ u 3 = F cos σ T 1 ( 9.64 )
O ( ϵ 0 ) D 0 2 u 0 + u 0 = F cos σ T 1 O ( ϵ 1 ) D 0 2 u 1 + u 1 = − 2 D 0 D 1 u 0 − 2 μ D 0 u 0 − u 0 3 \begin{align}
\mathrm{O}(\epsilon^0)\qquad\qquad & D_0^2u_0+u_0=F\cos\sigma T_1 \tag{9.65} \\
\mathrm{O}(\epsilon^1)\qquad\qquad & D_0^2u_1+u_1=-2D_0D_1u_0-2\mu D_0u_0-u_0^3 \tag{9.66}
\end{align}
O ( ϵ 0 ) O ( ϵ 1 ) D 0 2 u 0 + u 0 = F cos σ T 1 D 0 2 u 1 + u 1 = − 2 D 0 D 1 u 0 − 2 μ D 0 u 0 − u 0 3 ( 9.65 ) ( 9.66 )
for O ( ϵ 0 ) \mathrm{O}(\epsilon^0) O ( ϵ 0 ) (homogeneous + particular)
u 0 = A e i T 0 + A ˉ e − i T 0 + F cos σ T 1 (9.67) u_0=Ae^{iT_0}+\bar{A}e^{-iT_0}+F\cos\sigma T_1 \tag{9.67}
u 0 = A e i T 0 + A ˉ e − i T 0 + F cos σ T 1 ( 9.67 )
u 0 → O ( ϵ ) u_0\rightarrow\mathrm{O}(\epsilon) u 0 → O ( ϵ ) :
D 0 2 u 1 + u 1 = − 2 i ( A ′ + μ A ) e i T 0 − 3 A 2 A ˉ e i T 0 − 3 F 2 cos 2 σ T 1 A e i T 0 + c . c . + NST (9.68) D_0^2u_1+u_1=-2i(A'+\mu A)e^{iT_0}-3A^2\bar{A}e^{iT_0}-3F^2\cos^2\sigma T_1 Ae^{iT_0}+c.c.+\text{NST} \tag{9.68}
D 0 2 u 1 + u 1 = − 2 i ( A ′ + μ A ) e i T 0 − 3 A 2 A ˉ e i T 0 − 3 F 2 cos 2 σ T 1 A e i T 0 + c . c . + NST ( 9.68 )
solvability condition gives
a ′ = − μ a a β ′ = 3 8 a 3 + 3 2 F 2 a cos 2 σ T 1 \begin{align}
a'&=-\mu a \tag{9.71} \\
a\beta'&=\frac{3}{8}a^3+\frac{3}{2}F^2a\cos^2\sigma T_1 \tag{9.72}
\end{align}
a ′ a β ′ = − μ a = 8 3 a 3 + 2 3 F 2 a cos 2 σ T 1 ( 9.71 ) ( 9.72 )
the exact solution is
a = a 0 e − μ T 1 (9.73) a=a_0 e^{-\mu T_1} \tag{9.73}
a = a 0 e − μ T 1 ( 9.73 )
β = − 3 16 μ a 0 2 e − 2 μ T 1 + 3 4 F 2 T 1 + 3 F 2 8 σ sin 2 σ T 1 + β 0 (9.75) \beta=-\frac{3}{16\mu}a_0^2 e^{-2\mu T_1}+\frac{3}{4}F^2T_1+\frac{3F^2}{8\sigma}\sin 2\sigma T_1+\beta_0 \tag{9.75}
β = − 16 μ 3 a 0 2 e − 2 μ T 1 + 4 3 F 2 T 1 + 8 σ 3 F 2 sin 2 σ T 1 + β 0 ( 9.75 )
u = a 0 e − ϵ μ t cos [ ( 1 + 3 4 ϵ F 2 ) t − 3 16 μ a 0 2 e − 2 ϵ μ t + 3 ϵ F 2 8 ω sin 2 ω t + β 0 ] + F cos ω t + O ( ϵ ) (9.77) \begin{align}
u=&\ a_0e^{-\epsilon\mu t}\cos\left[\left(1+\frac{3}{4}\epsilon F^2\right)t-\frac{3}{16\mu}a_0^2e^{-2\epsilon\mu t}+\frac{3\epsilon F^2}{8\omega}\sin 2\omega t+\beta_0\right] \\
&+F\cos\omega t+\mathrm{O}(\epsilon)
\end{align} \tag{9.77}
u = a 0 e − ϵ μ t cos [ ( 1 + 4 3 ϵ F 2 ) t − 16 μ 3 a 0 2 e − 2 ϵ μ t + 8 ω 3 ϵ F 2 sin 2 ω t + β 0 ] + F cos ω t + O ( ϵ ) ( 9.77 )
Primary Resonance
In this case ω ≈ 1 \omega\approx 1 ω ≈ 1
u 0 u_0 u 0 becomes very large as ω → 1 \omega\rightarrow 1 ω → 1 , and the ordering of the terms above is rendered invalid.
Attempt 1: reorder the nonlinear ϵ u 3 \epsilon u^3 ϵ u 3 and the damping 2 ϵ μ u ˙ 2\epsilon\mu\dot{u} 2 ϵ μ u ˙ terms to appear at O ( ϵ 0 ) \mathrm{O}(\epsilon^0) O ( ϵ 0 ) , thereby balancing the effect of the primary-resonance excitation. However, this choice leads to the original equation at O ( ϵ 0 ) \mathrm{O}(\epsilon^0) O ( ϵ 0 ) .
Attempt 2: reorder the excitation F cos ω t F\cos\omega t F cos ω t so that it appears at O ( ϵ ) \mathrm{O}(\epsilon) O ( ϵ ) where the nonlinear and damping terms first appear. Let F = ϵ f F=\epsilon f F = ϵ f
u ¨ + u + 2 ϵ μ u ˙ + ϵ u 3 = ϵ f cos ω t (9.82) \ddot{u}+u+2\epsilon\mu\dot{u}+\epsilon u^3=\epsilon f\cos\omega t \tag{9.82}
u ¨ + u + 2 ϵ μ u ˙ + ϵ u 3 = ϵ f cos ω t ( 9.82 )
O ( ϵ 0 ) D 0 2 u 0 + u 0 = 0 O ( ϵ 1 ) D 0 2 u 1 + u 1 = − 2 D 0 D 1 u 0 − 2 μ D 0 u 0 − u 0 3 + f cos ω T 0 \begin{align}
\mathrm{O}(\epsilon^0)\qquad\qquad & D_0^2u_0+u_0=0 \tag{9.84} \\
\mathrm{O}(\epsilon^1)\qquad\qquad & D_0^2u_1+u_1=-2D_0D_1u_0-2\mu D_0u_0-u_0^3+f\cos\omega T_0 \tag{9.86}
\end{align}
O ( ϵ 0 ) O ( ϵ 1 ) D 0 2 u 0 + u 0 = 0 D 0 2 u 1 + u 1 = − 2 D 0 D 1 u 0 − 2 μ D 0 u 0 − u 0 3 + f cos ω T 0 ( 9.84 ) ( 9.86 )
for O ( ϵ 0 ) \mathrm{O}(\epsilon^0) O ( ϵ 0 )
u 0 = A ( T 1 ) e i T 0 + A ˉ ( T 1 ) e − i T 0 (9.87) u_0=A(T_1)e^{iT_0}+\bar{A}(T_1)e^{-iT_0} \tag{9.87}
u 0 = A ( T 1 ) e i T 0 + A ˉ ( T 1 ) e − i T 0 ( 9.87 )
u 0 → O ( ϵ ) u_0\rightarrow\mathrm{O}(\epsilon) u 0 → O ( ϵ ) :
D 0 2 u 1 + u 1 = − ( 2 i A ′ + 2 i μ A + 3 A 2 A ˉ ) e i T 0 − A 3 e 3 i T 0 + 1 2 f e i ω T 0 + c . c . (9.88) D_0^2u_1+u_1=-(2iA'+2i\mu A+3A^2\bar{A})e^{iT_0}-A^3e^{3iT_0}+\frac{1}{2}f e^{i\omega T_0}+c.c. \tag{9.88}
D 0 2 u 1 + u 1 = − ( 2 i A ′ + 2 i μ A + 3 A 2 A ˉ ) e i T 0 − A 3 e 3 i T 0 + 2 1 f e iω T 0 + c . c . ( 9.88 )
Introduce detuning parameter σ \sigma σ defined by
ω = 1 + ϵ σ (9.89) \omega=1+\epsilon\sigma \tag{9.89}
ω = 1 + ϵ σ ( 9.89 )
D 0 2 u 1 + u 1 = − ( 2 i A ′ + 2 i μ A + 3 A 2 A ˉ ) e i T 0 + 1 2 f e i σ T 1 e i T 0 + c . c . + NST (9.91) D_0^2u_1+u_1=-(2iA'+2i\mu A+3A^2\bar{A})e^{iT_0}+\frac{1}{2}fe^{i\sigma T_1}e^{iT_0}+c.c.+\text{NST} \tag{9.91}
D 0 2 u 1 + u 1 = − ( 2 i A ′ + 2 i μ A + 3 A 2 A ˉ ) e i T 0 + 2 1 f e iσ T 1 e i T 0 + c . c . + NST ( 9.91 )
then follow the process in the case ω ≈ 3 , 1 3 \omega\approx 3,\frac{1}{3} ω ≈ 3 , 3 1 to obtain the exact solution
u = a cos ( ω t − γ ) + O ( ϵ ) (9.100) u=a\cos(\omega t-\gamma)+\mathrm{O}(\epsilon) \tag{9.100}
u = a cos ( ω t − γ ) + O ( ϵ ) ( 9.100 )
a ′ = − μ a + 1 2 f sin γ a γ ′ = σ a − 3 8 a 3 + 1 2 f cos γ \begin{align}
a'&=-\mu a+\frac{1}{2}f\sin\gamma \tag{9.98} \\
a\gamma'&=\sigma a-\frac{3}{8}a^3+\frac{1}{2}f\cos\gamma \tag{9.99}
\end{align}
a ′ a γ ′ = − μ a + 2 1 f sin γ = σ a − 8 3 a 3 + 2 1 f cos γ ( 9.98 ) ( 9.99 )
11 The Mathieu Equation
u ¨ + ( δ + 2 ϵ cos 2 t ) u = 0 (11.2) \ddot{u}+(\delta+2\epsilon\cos 2t)u=0 \tag{11.2}
u ¨ + ( δ + 2 ϵ cos 2 t ) u = 0 ( 11.2 )
The Floquet Theory
(11.2) is a second-order linear homogeneous equation, it possesses two linearly independent solutions u 1 ( t ) u_1(t) u 1 ( t ) and u 2 ( t ) u_2(t) u 2 ( t ) satisfying the initial conditions
u 1 ( 0 ) = 1 u ˙ 1 ( 0 ) = 0 u 2 ( 0 ) = 0 u ˙ 2 ( 0 ) = 1 (11.13) \begin{array}{cc}
u_1(0)=1 & \dot{u}_1(0)=0 \\
u_2(0)=0 & \dot{u}_2(0)=1
\end{array}\tag{11.13}
u 1 ( 0 ) = 1 u 2 ( 0 ) = 0 u ˙ 1 ( 0 ) = 0 u ˙ 2 ( 0 ) = 1 ( 11.13 )
The solutions have a period of π \pi π , the evolution equation in matrix notation is
u ( t + π ) = A u ( t ) (11.20) \boldsymbol{u}(t+\pi)=\boldsymbol{A}\boldsymbol{u}(t) \tag{11.20}
u ( t + π ) = A u ( t ) ( 11.20 )
A = [ u 1 ( π ) u ˙ 1 ( π ) u 2 ( π ) u ˙ 2 ( π ) ] u = [ u 1 u 2 ] (11.21) \boldsymbol{A}=\left[\begin{array}{cc}
u_1(\pi) & \dot{u}_1(\pi) \\
u_2(\pi) & \dot{u}_2(\pi)
\end{array}\right]\quad \boldsymbol{u}=\left[\begin{array}{c}
u_1 \\
u_2
\end{array}\right] \tag{11.21}
A = [ u 1 ( π ) u 2 ( π ) u ˙ 1 ( π ) u ˙ 2 ( π ) ] u = [ u 1 u 2 ] ( 11.21 )
Try diagonalizing the matrix A \boldsymbol{A} A , we have a diagonal matrix B \boldsymbol{B} B whose eigenvalues are given by
λ 2 − tr ( A ) λ + 1 = 0 (11.32) \lambda^2-\text{tr}(\boldsymbol{A})\lambda+1=0 \tag{11.32}
λ 2 − tr ( A ) λ + 1 = 0 ( 11.32 )
λ 1 , 2 = tr ( A ) ± [ tr ( A ) ] 2 − 4 2 (11.34) \lambda_{1,2}=\frac{\text{tr}(\boldsymbol{A})\pm\sqrt{[\text{tr}(\boldsymbol{A})]^2-4}}{2} \tag{11.34}
λ 1 , 2 = 2 tr ( A ) ± [ tr ( A ) ] 2 − 4 ( 11.34 )
And the evolution equation gives
v ( t + π ) = B v ( t ) (11.27) \boldsymbol{v}(t+\pi)=\boldsymbol{B}\boldsymbol{v}(t) \tag{11.27}
v ( t + π ) = B v ( t ) ( 11.27 )
B = P A P − 1 (11.29) \boldsymbol{B}=\boldsymbol{P}\boldsymbol{A}\boldsymbol{P}^{-1} \tag{11.29}
B = P A P − 1 ( 11.29 )
u ( t ) = P − 1 v ( t ) (11.24) \boldsymbol{u}(t)=\boldsymbol{P}^{-1}\boldsymbol{v}(t) \tag{11.24}
u ( t ) = P − 1 v ( t ) ( 11.24 )
(a) When the diagonal matrix has the form
B = [ λ 1 0 0 λ 2 ] (11.35) \boldsymbol{B}=\left[\begin{array}{cc}
\lambda_1 & 0 \\
0 & \lambda_2
\end{array}\right] \tag{11.35}
B = [ λ 1 0 0 λ 2 ] ( 11.35 )
The evolution equation reads,
v 1 ( t + π ) = λ 1 v 1 ( t ) v 2 ( t + π ) = λ 2 v 2 ( t ) (11.38) \begin{array}{c}
\boldsymbol{v}_1(t+\pi)=\lambda_1\boldsymbol{v}_1(t) \\
\boldsymbol{v}_2(t+\pi)=\lambda_2\boldsymbol{v}_2(t)
\end{array} \tag{11.38}
v 1 ( t + π ) = λ 1 v 1 ( t ) v 2 ( t + π ) = λ 2 v 2 ( t ) ( 11.38 )
v 1 ( t + n π ) = λ 1 n v 1 ( t ) (11.39) \boldsymbol{v}_1(t+n\pi)=\lambda_1^n\boldsymbol{v}_1(t) \tag{11.39}
v 1 ( t + nπ ) = λ 1 n v 1 ( t ) ( 11.39 )
So λ 1 = λ 2 = ± 1 \lambda_1=\lambda_2=\pm 1 λ 1 = λ 2 = ± 1 separate stable from unstable solutions and are usually referred to as transition values .
Solving Eq.(11.38) which named normal or Floquet form
e − γ 1 ( t + π ) v 1 ( t + π ) = λ 1 e − γ 1 π e − γ 1 t v 1 ( t ) (11.43) e^{-\gamma_1(t+\pi)}v_1(t+\pi)=\lambda_1e^{-\gamma_1\pi}e^{-\gamma_1 t}v_1(t) \tag{11.43}
e − γ 1 ( t + π ) v 1 ( t + π ) = λ 1 e − γ 1 π e − γ 1 t v 1 ( t ) ( 11.43 )
The exact solution is
v 1 , 2 ( t ) = e γ 1 , 2 t ϕ 1 , 2 ( t ) (11.46,11.48) \boldsymbol{v}_{1,2}(t)=e^{\gamma_{1,2} t}\phi_{1,2}(t) \tag{11.46,11.48}
v 1 , 2 ( t ) = e γ 1 , 2 t ϕ 1 , 2 ( t ) ( 11.46,11.48 )
where ϕ 1 , 2 ( t ) \phi_{1,2}(t) ϕ 1 , 2 ( t ) is arbitrary function satisfing ϕ 1 , 2 ( t + π ) = ϕ 1 , 2 ( t ) \phi_{1,2}(t+\pi)=\phi_{1,2}(t) ϕ 1 , 2 ( t + π ) = ϕ 1 , 2 ( t ) , and the characteristic exponent is
γ 1 , 2 = 1 π ln λ 1 , 2 (11.44) \gamma_{1,2}=\frac{1}{\pi}\ln \lambda_{1,2} \tag{11.44}
γ 1 , 2 = π 1 ln λ 1 , 2 ( 11.44 )
(b) When A \boldsymbol{A} A is not diagonalizable, the matrix B \boldsymbol{B} B has the form
B = [ 1 0 1 1 ] or [ − 1 0 1 − 1 ] ≡ [ λ 0 1 λ ] (11.37) \boldsymbol{B}=\left[\begin{array}{cc}
1 & 0 \\
1 & 1
\end{array}\right]
\text{ or }\left[\begin{array}{cc}
-1 & 0 \\
1 & -1
\end{array}\right]\equiv\left[\begin{array}{cc}
\lambda & 0 \\
1 & \lambda
\end{array}\right]
\tag{11.37}
B = [ 1 1 0 1 ] or [ − 1 1 0 − 1 ] ≡ [ λ 1 0 λ ] ( 11.37 )
The normal / Floquet form
v 1 ( t + π ) = λ v 1 ( t ) v 2 ( t + π ) = λ v 2 ( t ) + v 1 ( t ) \begin{align}
v_1(t+\pi)&=\lambda v_1(t) \tag{11.49a} \\
v_2(t+\pi)&=\lambda v_2(t)+v_1(t) \tag{11.49b}
\end{align}
v 1 ( t + π ) v 2 ( t + π ) = λ v 1 ( t ) = λ v 2 ( t ) + v 1 ( t ) ( 11.49a ) ( 11.49b )
The solution for v 1 ( t ) v_1(t) v 1 ( t ) is the same as (a)
v 1 ( t ) = e γ t ϕ 1 ( t ) ϕ 1 ( t + π ) = ϕ 1 ( t ) and γ = 1 π ln λ (11.50) \begin{array}{c}
\boldsymbol{v}_1(t)=e^{\gamma t}\phi_1(t) \\
\phi_1(t+\pi)=\phi_1(t) \quad\text{and}\quad \gamma=\dfrac{1}{\pi}\ln \lambda
\end{array} \tag{11.50}
v 1 ( t ) = e γ t ϕ 1 ( t ) ϕ 1 ( t + π ) = ϕ 1 ( t ) and γ = π 1 ln λ ( 11.50 )
for v 2 ( t ) v_2(t) v 2 ( t ) ,
e − γ ( t + π ) v 2 ( t + π ) = e − γ t v 2 ( t ) + 1 λ ϕ 1 ( t ) (11.51) e^{-\gamma(t+\pi)}v_2(t+\pi)=e^{-\gamma t}v_2(t)+\frac{1}{\lambda}\phi_1(t) \tag{11.51}
e − γ ( t + π ) v 2 ( t + π ) = e − γ t v 2 ( t ) + λ 1 ϕ 1 ( t ) ( 11.51 )
v 2 ( t ) = e γ t [ ϕ 2 ( t ) + t π λ ϕ 1 ( t ) ] , ϕ 2 ( t + π ) = ϕ 2 ( t ) (11.52) \boldsymbol{v}_2(t)=e^{\gamma t}[\phi_2(t)+\frac{t}{\pi\lambda}\phi_1(t)],\ \phi_2(t+\pi)=\phi_2(t) \tag{11.52}
v 2 ( t ) = e γ t [ ϕ 2 ( t ) + π λ t ϕ 1 ( t )] , ϕ 2 ( t + π ) = ϕ 2 ( t ) ( 11.52 )
λ 1 , 2 = tr ( A ) ± [ tr ( A ) ] 2 − 4 2 (11.34) \lambda_{1,2}=\frac{\text{tr}(\boldsymbol{A})\pm\sqrt{[\text{tr}(\boldsymbol{A})]^2-4}}{2} \tag{11.34}
λ 1 , 2 = 2 tr ( A ) ± [ tr ( A ) ] 2 − 4 ( 11.34 )
When ∣ tr ( A ) ∣ > 2 |\text{tr}(\boldsymbol{A})|>2 ∣ tr ( A ) ∣ > 2 , the solutions contains one unbounded and another bounded with time.
When ∣ tr ( A ) ∣ < 2 |\text{tr}(\boldsymbol{A})|<2 ∣ tr ( A ) ∣ < 2 , the solutions are bounded.